Human scale means "of a scale comparable to a human A human is a member of a species of bipedal primates in the family Hominidae . DNA and fossil evidence indicates that modern humans originated in east Africa about 200,000 years ago. When compared to other animals and primates, humans have a highly developed brain, capable of abstract reasoning, language, introspection and problem solving. This being".

A number of characteristic physical quantities can be associated with the human body, the human mind, and the preservation of human life.

Contents

Science vs. human scale

Many of the objects of scientific interest in the universe are much larger than human scale (stars, galaxies) or much smaller than human scale (molecules, atoms, subatomic particles).

Similarly, many time periods studied in science involve time scales much greater than human timescales (geological The geologic time scale is a chronologic schema relating stratigraphy to time that is used by geologists, paleontologists and other earth scientists to describe the timing and relationships between events that have occurred during the history of the Earth. The table of geologic time spans presented here agrees with the dates and nomenclature and cosmological time scales) or much shorter than human timescales (atomic and subatomic events).

Mathematicians and scientists use very large and small numbers Within a set of positive and negative numbers there is ambiguity, because being closer to zero does not correspond to being less, but to being less in absolute value. Depending on context a negative number may be called "smaller" if it is closer to zero, or if it is more negative to describe physical quantities, and have created even larger and smaller numbers for theoretical purposes.

Human scale in architecture

Humans interact with their environments based on their physical dimensions, capabilities and limits. The field of anthropometrics Anthropometry , in physical anthropology, refers to the measurement of the human individual for the purposes of understanding human physical variation (human measurement) has unanswered questions, but it's still true that human physical characteristics are fairly predictable and objectively measurable. Buildings scaled to human physical capabilities have steps, doorways, railings, work surfaces, seating, shelves, fixtures, walking distances, and other features that fit well to the average person.

Humans also interact with their environments based on their sensory capabilities. The fields of human perception systems, like perceptual psychology Perceptual psychology is a subfield of cognitive psychology that is concerned specifically with the pre-conscious innate aspects of the human cognitive system: perception. A pioneer of this field was J. J. Gibson. A major study was that of cognitive biases mostly due to affordances, i.e. the perceived utility of objects in, or features of, one's and cognitive psychology The school of thought arising from this approach is known as cognitivism which is interested in how people mentally represent information processing. It had its foundations in the work of Wilhelm Wundt, Gestalt psychology of Max Wertheimer, Wolfgang Köhler, and Kurt Koffka, and in the work of Jean Piaget, who provided a theory of stages/phases, are not exact sciences, because human information processing is not a purely physical act, and because perception is affected by cultural factors, personal preferences, experiences, and expectations. So human scale in architecture can also describe buildings with sightlines, acoustic properties, task lighting, ambient lighting, and spatial grammar that fit well with human senses. However, one important caveat is that human perceptions are always going to be less predictable and less measurable than physical dimensions.

Human scale in architecture is deliberately violated:

Common sense and human scale

"Common sense Common sense , based on a strict construction of the term, consists of what people in common would agree on: that which they "sense" as their common natural understanding. Some people (such as the authors of Merriam-Webster Online) use the phrase to refer to beliefs or propositions that — in their opinion — most people would consider" ideas tend to relate to events within human experience, and thus commenurate with these scales. There is thus no commonsense intuition of, for example, interstellar distances or speeds approaching the speed of light.

Weights and measures The definition, agreement, and practical use of units of measurement have played a crucial role in human endeavour from early ages up to this day. Disparate systems of measurement used to be very common. Now there is a global standard, the International System of units, the modern form of the metric system. The SI has been or is in the process of tend to reflect human scale, and many older systems of measurement featured units based directly on the dimensions of the body. The metric system The metric system is an international decimalised system of measurement, first adopted by France in 1791, that is the common system of measuring units used by most of the world. It exists in several variations, with different choices of fundamental units, though the choice of base units does not affect its day-to-day use. Over the last two, which is based on other more reproducible physical quantities, still attempts to keep its base units within the range of human experience. Other systems, such as Planck units In physics, Planck units are units of measurement named after the German physicist Max Planck, who first proposed them in 1899. They are an example of natural units, i.e. units of measurement designed so that certain fundamental physical constants are normalized to 1. The constants that Planck units normalize to 1 are the: are useful for theoretical purposes, but are not useful for everyday purposes.

Quotes

See also

Categories: Humans Humans are a species of hominid and the only surviving species of the genus Homo. There is only one extant subspecies, H. sapiens sapiens. Humans are notable for their intelligence, language, culture and technology | Human-based units of measure Units of measure based on the human body or attributes/abilities of a human . This does not include units further derived from these units (e.g. rod) unless they are also human based (e.g. foot)

 

The above information uses material from Wikipedia and is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License The purpose of this License is to make a manual, textbook, or other functional and useful document "free" in the sense of freedom: to assure everyone the effective freedom to copy and redistribute it, with or without modifying it, either commercially or noncommercially. Secondarily, this License preserves for the author and publisher a.
Some facts may not have been fully verified for accuracy. [Disclaimers Wikipedia is an online open-content collaborative encyclopedia, that is, a voluntary association of individuals and groups working to develop a common resource of human knowledge. The structure of the project allows anyone with an Internet connection to alter its content. Please be advised that nothing found here has necessarily been reviewed by]
This page was last archived by our server on Thu Aug 13 05:53:07 2009. [ refresh local cache ]
Displaying this page or its contents does not use any Wikimedia Foundation's resources.
The owners of this site proudly support the Wikimedia Foundation.


If there was ever a full scale nuclear war, with thousands of nukes, would it kill EVERY human, or just 99%?
Q. I'm just curious. People say it would eradicate the human race, but I have my doubts. I think at least a few million would survive.
Asked by NintendoTogepi - Tue Oct 28 13:15:01 2008 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments

A. No, not even close. In the largest study ever done on the possible effects of a nuclear war. The RAND corporation determined that in a full scale nuclear war, In which 14,000 nuclear warheads were used. That it would cause a period of global cooling ( nuclear winter ) that lasted about 3 years before the atmosphere started to clear. They estimated that approx 40% of the earths population would die from either direct effects of the nuclear weapons, radiation, disease or starvation. That study was done in the mid 1980's. Since then, the nuclear inventories have been reduced dramatically. Especially the means of delieverying nuclear warheads. The nations on earth, couldn't delievery 14,000 nuclear warheads now, if they wanted to. We… [cont.]
Answered by jeeper_peeper321 - Tue Oct 28 15:04:01 2008

Yahoo Answers Search: Human scale,
Sun Jul 19 22:23:30 2009