Government Answers
Are government officials in the Philippines allowed to by land and property using government funds?
Q. Are they allowed to do that? Of course what I mean is the property will bought and be owned by the government to be used for projects, and not be owned by Mr. Mayor or Mr. Governor. Doing a little research on it. Thanks.
Asked by - Tue Nov 1 05:15:00 2011 - Government - 1 Answers - Comments
A. According to Republic Act No. 7160 they are.
Answered by Alex,one-eyed in the land of the blind. - Tue Nov 1 07:33:47 2011
Q. Are they allowed to do that? Of course what I mean is the property will bought and be owned by the government to be used for projects, and not be owned by Mr. Mayor or Mr. Governor. Doing a little research on it. Thanks.
Asked by - Tue Nov 1 05:15:00 2011 - Government - 1 Answers - Comments
A. According to Republic Act No. 7160 they are.
Answered by Alex,one-eyed in the land of the blind. - Tue Nov 1 07:33:47 2011
What is the government s policy regarding the funding of stem cell research?
Q. A) All stem cell research can receive government funding. B) Only adult stem cell research can receive government funding. C) Only embryonic stem cell research can be funded. D) Only embryonic stem cell lines already established can be funded; other research using adult stem cells and cord blood or placental blood can be funded by the government.
Asked by - Mon May 9 19:20:48 2011 - Medicine - 1 Answers - Comments
A. Are you asking about the US government, or the Australian government? If you're asking about the US, the answer is D.
Answered by - Tue May 10 11:09:06 2011
Q. A) All stem cell research can receive government funding. B) Only adult stem cell research can receive government funding. C) Only embryonic stem cell research can be funded. D) Only embryonic stem cell lines already established can be funded; other research using adult stem cells and cord blood or placental blood can be funded by the government.
Asked by - Mon May 9 19:20:48 2011 - Medicine - 1 Answers - Comments
A. Are you asking about the US government, or the Australian government? If you're asking about the US, the answer is D.
Answered by - Tue May 10 11:09:06 2011
How does government welfare not breed irresponsibility, crime, and government slavery?
Q. If the government pays for you to eat and live, then those on welfare have NO cost to being irresponsible. They are being given an incentive to breed irresponsibilty, crime, and government slavery, because they have no cost to being irresponsible. Do you agree?
Asked by - Fri Feb 12 16:19:08 2010 - Politics - 8 Answers - Comments
A. Maybe if walmart didnt pay its people wages that put them just above the poverty level they wouldn't need to be on welfare. Why does walmart have so much information for their workers to be on welfare?
Answered by jamestownx - Fri Feb 12 16:23:06 2010
Q. If the government pays for you to eat and live, then those on welfare have NO cost to being irresponsible. They are being given an incentive to breed irresponsibilty, crime, and government slavery, because they have no cost to being irresponsible. Do you agree?
Asked by - Fri Feb 12 16:19:08 2010 - Politics - 8 Answers - Comments
A. Maybe if walmart didnt pay its people wages that put them just above the poverty level they wouldn't need to be on welfare. Why does walmart have so much information for their workers to be on welfare?
Answered by jamestownx - Fri Feb 12 16:23:06 2010
What extend should a government be encouraged to do business?
Q. In Malaysia, there are many areas where the government has investments through its investment arm or through the ruling party's investment arm. Do we vote for a certain political party to form a government so that it can be rich and the people be poor or deprived of the fruits of economy? I totally disagree with too much investment by the government. The people should be allowed to participate in such investments. Not just the ruling government and its cronies. This is not democracy. This is day light robbery.
Asked by bornfreemalaysian - Wed May 26 23:06:20 2010 - Government - 1 Answers - Comments
A. Best government is small government. Even in democracy, we vote for whatever party or whatever person. That doesn't give them right to over taxes us. Governement run business is bad idea because govenment's business can run even in negative profit. This mean bad business system just keep living suck up taxespayer's money.
Answered by Seeker - Wed May 26 23:15:48 2010
Q. In Malaysia, there are many areas where the government has investments through its investment arm or through the ruling party's investment arm. Do we vote for a certain political party to form a government so that it can be rich and the people be poor or deprived of the fruits of economy? I totally disagree with too much investment by the government. The people should be allowed to participate in such investments. Not just the ruling government and its cronies. This is not democracy. This is day light robbery.
Asked by bornfreemalaysian - Wed May 26 23:06:20 2010 - Government - 1 Answers - Comments
A. Best government is small government. Even in democracy, we vote for whatever party or whatever person. That doesn't give them right to over taxes us. Governement run business is bad idea because govenment's business can run even in negative profit. This mean bad business system just keep living suck up taxespayer's money.
Answered by Seeker - Wed May 26 23:15:48 2010
What is the difference between federal government purchases (spending) and federal government expenditures?
Q. Which of the following is the correct answer, and why? A. Government expenditures are included in government purchases. B. Government purchases are included in government expenditures. C. Government purchases refer to spending for which no good or service is received. D. They are the same.
Asked by - Sun Nov 6 20:55:29 2011 - Government - 1 Answers - Comments
A. B. Government purchases are included in government expenditures Purchases are the items bought; expenditures are the finances used for any outgoing transaction (the costs or the transaction itself). Many expenditures do not purchase a physical item. E.g., a soldier's wages is an expenditure but the soldier was not purchased. Another example: donating money to another country is an expenditure on the government fiscal books but nothing was purchased. On the other hand, purchases are included in expenditures.
Answered by - Sun Nov 6 21:11:45 2011
Q. Which of the following is the correct answer, and why? A. Government expenditures are included in government purchases. B. Government purchases are included in government expenditures. C. Government purchases refer to spending for which no good or service is received. D. They are the same.
Asked by - Sun Nov 6 20:55:29 2011 - Government - 1 Answers - Comments
A. B. Government purchases are included in government expenditures Purchases are the items bought; expenditures are the finances used for any outgoing transaction (the costs or the transaction itself). Many expenditures do not purchase a physical item. E.g., a soldier's wages is an expenditure but the soldier was not purchased. Another example: donating money to another country is an expenditure on the government fiscal books but nothing was purchased. On the other hand, purchases are included in expenditures.
Answered by - Sun Nov 6 21:11:45 2011
What is the government's responsibility to the people of this country?
Q. I seem to see a huge difference between what conservatives and liberals view as the governments responsibility towards the citizens.If you are liberal you seem to think the government is meant to be the provider of all our needs, wants, and desires. Where would you as a liberal draw the line on what the government should and should not be providing? Would you say everyone should be given food, clothing, housing, cell phones, internet, college, spending money, cars? Where is your line? What should people provide for themselves, if they want it? Maj- I agree just wondering where all the "social" programs fit into that? I meant federal government, guess I should have clarified.
Asked by jsmom - Mon Jul 25 07:47:40 2011 - Politics - 6 Answers - Comments
A. This answer is simple... and 200+ years old. "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." EDIT: To clarify, there has been a disagreement about the "General Welfare" clause since it was written. Some say it isn't a clause... but just a statement of what is to come in the enumerated powers that follow. This debate will never end. As of now it is a clause though that allows for items such as you listed. Please research "Madison vs.… [cont.]
Answered by - Mon Jul 25 07:50:38 2011
Q. I seem to see a huge difference between what conservatives and liberals view as the governments responsibility towards the citizens.If you are liberal you seem to think the government is meant to be the provider of all our needs, wants, and desires. Where would you as a liberal draw the line on what the government should and should not be providing? Would you say everyone should be given food, clothing, housing, cell phones, internet, college, spending money, cars? Where is your line? What should people provide for themselves, if they want it? Maj- I agree just wondering where all the "social" programs fit into that? I meant federal government, guess I should have clarified.
Asked by jsmom - Mon Jul 25 07:47:40 2011 - Politics - 6 Answers - Comments
A. This answer is simple... and 200+ years old. "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." EDIT: To clarify, there has been a disagreement about the "General Welfare" clause since it was written. Some say it isn't a clause... but just a statement of what is to come in the enumerated powers that follow. This debate will never end. As of now it is a clause though that allows for items such as you listed. Please research "Madison vs.… [cont.]
Answered by - Mon Jul 25 07:50:38 2011
What is the best government in the world?
Q. I just want to know different people's opinions. I believe that each person will naturally want different things from their government, and I seek to find out if this is true. In which case, there is no best government for all but only best government for the individual. I am asking best government in the world based on country, but not necessarily best country (climate, population, culture, etc can influence this). I am NOT asking best government system (democracy, republic, totalitarian, socialist democracy, etc) So what do you believe is the best government in the world? You can choose from any region OR time period.
Asked by - Sun Dec 26 20:51:14 2010 - Current Events - 6 Answers - Comments
A. we can not actually praise any government because no government is actually working for the welfare of the people. but still i hope the govt of USA is good.
Answered by - Sun Dec 26 20:57:11 2010
Q. I just want to know different people's opinions. I believe that each person will naturally want different things from their government, and I seek to find out if this is true. In which case, there is no best government for all but only best government for the individual. I am asking best government in the world based on country, but not necessarily best country (climate, population, culture, etc can influence this). I am NOT asking best government system (democracy, republic, totalitarian, socialist democracy, etc) So what do you believe is the best government in the world? You can choose from any region OR time period.
Asked by - Sun Dec 26 20:51:14 2010 - Current Events - 6 Answers - Comments
A. we can not actually praise any government because no government is actually working for the welfare of the people. but still i hope the govt of USA is good.
Answered by - Sun Dec 26 20:57:11 2010
What would stop the government from seizing a coin collection, if they simply wanted to take it?
Q. The government uses civil asset forfeiture to seize any property they want, making the victim spend in excess of $10,000 and 3 years to recover his property. The best part for the government is, they do not need to prove you did anything wrong, or pesky warrants to take your property. All they need is the desire to take it, which leads me to my question. Under civil asset forfeiture, what would prevent the government from seizing a personal collection of gold and silver coins for no other reason than they wanted it?
Asked by - Sat Nov 12 15:09:31 2011 - Politics - 7 Answers - Comments
A. A Conservative President and Conservative-controlled Congress.
Answered by Judge Andrew - Sat Nov 12 15:12:06 2011
Q. The government uses civil asset forfeiture to seize any property they want, making the victim spend in excess of $10,000 and 3 years to recover his property. The best part for the government is, they do not need to prove you did anything wrong, or pesky warrants to take your property. All they need is the desire to take it, which leads me to my question. Under civil asset forfeiture, what would prevent the government from seizing a personal collection of gold and silver coins for no other reason than they wanted it?
Asked by - Sat Nov 12 15:09:31 2011 - Politics - 7 Answers - Comments
A. A Conservative President and Conservative-controlled Congress.
Answered by Judge Andrew - Sat Nov 12 15:12:06 2011
g OVERNMENT???...?
Q. What has led to the growth of the Executive Office of the President?
Asked by Therealshannond - Mon Aug 22 15:57:55 2011 - Government - 1 Answers - Comments
A. Complacency.
Answered by - Mon Aug 22 15:59:02 2011
Q. What has led to the growth of the Executive Office of the President?
Asked by Therealshannond - Mon Aug 22 15:57:55 2011 - Government - 1 Answers - Comments
A. Complacency.
Answered by - Mon Aug 22 15:59:02 2011
How can we reduce the size of government without causing another great depression?
Q. The government has grown too big and needs to be reduced in order to stop the spiraling deficit. But how can this be done without causing another great depression? The government is the largest employer in the US, millions of people are employed by it. When its size is reduced by any significant amount, people must be laid off and spending must also be reduced. However, with the government laying so many people off, two things will happen; the tax revenue the government receives from their salaries will be eliminated, and those newly unemployed people will sharply reduce their spending. With less taxes coming in, the government would have to cut spending even more, further reducing its workforce and spending. With hundreds of thousands of… [cont.]
Asked by OwlBear - Wed Dec 15 11:53:47 2010 - Economics - 3 Answers - Comments
A. ROTFL. I think you are right in noting that we couldn't reduce the size of the U.S. government _significantly_ without causing another Great Depression, but unlike you, I don't see this as a problem. The U.S. used to have a standard of living that was twice as high as anywhere else in the world. Now, countries such as the Netherlands and Switzerland have higher median incomes they and the Scandinavian countries have higher standards of living. All the northern European countries have higher economic mobility Their workers are better educated, etc. Is it an accident that they have such good results with a significantly bigger government (as a percentage of GDP) than the U.S.? The idea that we have to cut the size of government in order to… [cont.]
Answered by simplicitus - Wed Dec 15 23:46:42 2010
Q. The government has grown too big and needs to be reduced in order to stop the spiraling deficit. But how can this be done without causing another great depression? The government is the largest employer in the US, millions of people are employed by it. When its size is reduced by any significant amount, people must be laid off and spending must also be reduced. However, with the government laying so many people off, two things will happen; the tax revenue the government receives from their salaries will be eliminated, and those newly unemployed people will sharply reduce their spending. With less taxes coming in, the government would have to cut spending even more, further reducing its workforce and spending. With hundreds of thousands of… [cont.]
Asked by OwlBear - Wed Dec 15 11:53:47 2010 - Economics - 3 Answers - Comments
A. ROTFL. I think you are right in noting that we couldn't reduce the size of the U.S. government _significantly_ without causing another Great Depression, but unlike you, I don't see this as a problem. The U.S. used to have a standard of living that was twice as high as anywhere else in the world. Now, countries such as the Netherlands and Switzerland have higher median incomes they and the Scandinavian countries have higher standards of living. All the northern European countries have higher economic mobility Their workers are better educated, etc. Is it an accident that they have such good results with a significantly bigger government (as a percentage of GDP) than the U.S.? The idea that we have to cut the size of government in order to… [cont.]
Answered by simplicitus - Wed Dec 15 23:46:42 2010
GOVERn MENT?
Q. how many members does the U.S Senate and the U.S House of resentatives have? pleasse answer i cant find this ANYWHERE!! ...o and what or who gives the government its power?
Asked by happygurl1275 - Wed Feb 6 14:32:17 2008 - Government - 2 Answers - Comments
A. 100 in the Senate, 435 in the House. A government derives its power from the people.
Answered by Teekno - Wed Feb 6 14:36:30 2008
Q. how many members does the U.S Senate and the U.S House of resentatives have? pleasse answer i cant find this ANYWHERE!! ...o and what or who gives the government its power?
Asked by happygurl1275 - Wed Feb 6 14:32:17 2008 - Government - 2 Answers - Comments
A. 100 in the Senate, 435 in the House. A government derives its power from the people.
Answered by Teekno - Wed Feb 6 14:36:30 2008
What are some ways to shrink government down to the size where you can drown it in a bathtub?
Q. If you can cause problems in the economy will government spend money? If government spends too much money will government have to make cuts? And what other libertarian Republicans share this Grover Norquist quote from before 911? I don't want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub" Grover Norquist May 21st hee hee 2001.
Asked by - Sun May 22 16:03:51 2011 - Politics - 5 Answers - Comments
A. Keep spending the same amount while cutting taxes, then claim the deficit comes from spending too much.
Answered by Vito1964 - Sun May 22 16:14:41 2011
Q. If you can cause problems in the economy will government spend money? If government spends too much money will government have to make cuts? And what other libertarian Republicans share this Grover Norquist quote from before 911? I don't want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub" Grover Norquist May 21st hee hee 2001.
Asked by - Sun May 22 16:03:51 2011 - Politics - 5 Answers - Comments
A. Keep spending the same amount while cutting taxes, then claim the deficit comes from spending too much.
Answered by Vito1964 - Sun May 22 16:14:41 2011
What are government officials, in a democratic government?
Q. I'm doing this project for my Civics class. I have to create my own government. It says how will government officials be elected, and I'm using the U.S.A.'s government(democratic government) as my government. The teacher said we could pick a government or use one that already exists. To be back on track, I want to know what government officials are and if you know how are they elected.
Asked by don't call my name. - Sat May 15 21:04:19 2010 - Other - Politics & Government - 1 Answers - Comments
A. The intent of the designers of our Democratic Republic was to place elected Government officials in positions that answered to & served the citizens. We are currently experiencing a perversion of that intent with executive & representative branches that are ignoring & actually defying the people that put them in office. A majority of the citizens of the USA are frustrated at present. Frustration is a form of anger.
Answered by uncle meat - Sat May 15 21:12:49 2010
Q. I'm doing this project for my Civics class. I have to create my own government. It says how will government officials be elected, and I'm using the U.S.A.'s government(democratic government) as my government. The teacher said we could pick a government or use one that already exists. To be back on track, I want to know what government officials are and if you know how are they elected.
Asked by don't call my name. - Sat May 15 21:04:19 2010 - Other - Politics & Government - 1 Answers - Comments
A. The intent of the designers of our Democratic Republic was to place elected Government officials in positions that answered to & served the citizens. We are currently experiencing a perversion of that intent with executive & representative branches that are ignoring & actually defying the people that put them in office. A majority of the citizens of the USA are frustrated at present. Frustration is a form of anger.
Answered by uncle meat - Sat May 15 21:12:49 2010
How big of a government do you need to police personal behaviors?
Q. How big does government have to be to ensure people dont use drugs? How big does government have to be to ensure gay people cant marry? How big does government have to be to make sure a woman carries child to term?
Asked by sound_of_the_silenced3 - Fri Sep 23 23:06:33 2011 - Politics - 6 Answers - Comments
A. it is a good government.
Answered by - Tue Sep 27 22:36:00 2011
Q. How big does government have to be to ensure people dont use drugs? How big does government have to be to ensure gay people cant marry? How big does government have to be to make sure a woman carries child to term?
Asked by sound_of_the_silenced3 - Fri Sep 23 23:06:33 2011 - Politics - 6 Answers - Comments
A. it is a good government.
Answered by - Tue Sep 27 22:36:00 2011
Do these cases of government debt and budget deficit indicate potential problems for the economy?
Q. Does the size of the government's debt and the size of the budget deficit indicate potential problems for the economy in any of these cases? 1. The government's debt is relatively low, but the government is running a large budget deficit as it builds a high-speed rail system to connect the major cities of the nation. 2. The government's debt is relatively high due to a recently ended deficit-financed war, but the government is now running only a small budget deficit. 3. The government's debt is relatively low, but the government is running a budget deficit to finance the interest payments on the debt.
Asked by Amy B - Sat Feb 16 20:34:05 2008 - Economics - 2 Answers - Comments
A. Well, the first two indicate government spending which circulates money in the economy leading to a higher GDP. The third one indicates a deficit not due to government spending. The third one would have more of an impact on the economy so I would say the third one would indicate what you had asked.
Answered by mnid007 - Sat Feb 16 20:45:20 2008
Q. Does the size of the government's debt and the size of the budget deficit indicate potential problems for the economy in any of these cases? 1. The government's debt is relatively low, but the government is running a large budget deficit as it builds a high-speed rail system to connect the major cities of the nation. 2. The government's debt is relatively high due to a recently ended deficit-financed war, but the government is now running only a small budget deficit. 3. The government's debt is relatively low, but the government is running a budget deficit to finance the interest payments on the debt.
Asked by Amy B - Sat Feb 16 20:34:05 2008 - Economics - 2 Answers - Comments
A. Well, the first two indicate government spending which circulates money in the economy leading to a higher GDP. The third one indicates a deficit not due to government spending. The third one would have more of an impact on the economy so I would say the third one would indicate what you had asked.
Answered by mnid007 - Sat Feb 16 20:45:20 2008
What is the result of government investigations into bank unfairness?
Q. It seems the banks are constantly under investigation by the government for unfair behavior, such as outrageous charges. The government usually concedes that the bank has behaved wrongly. But nothing ever seems to happen about it. Does the government do anything about it? And if not, why? If the government can't do anything about it, why investigate on the pretense it can?
Asked by Zippey - Fri Jun 12 03:40:57 2009 - Government - 2 Answers - Comments
A. The full list of details can be found on this website. Since bank charges reclaiming began 5,962,605 template letters have been downloaded from this site alone. The banks are estimated to have paid out PS1bn, with more than a million people thought to have got their cash back. Another million could be on hold. This has been perhaps the biggest consumer revolution since the poll tax riots, yet this has been fought from armchairs. This timeline shows the incredible rise of bank charges reclaiming...
Answered by James S - Fri Jun 12 03:45:45 2009
Q. It seems the banks are constantly under investigation by the government for unfair behavior, such as outrageous charges. The government usually concedes that the bank has behaved wrongly. But nothing ever seems to happen about it. Does the government do anything about it? And if not, why? If the government can't do anything about it, why investigate on the pretense it can?
Asked by Zippey - Fri Jun 12 03:40:57 2009 - Government - 2 Answers - Comments
A. The full list of details can be found on this website. Since bank charges reclaiming began 5,962,605 template letters have been downloaded from this site alone. The banks are estimated to have paid out PS1bn, with more than a million people thought to have got their cash back. Another million could be on hold. This has been perhaps the biggest consumer revolution since the poll tax riots, yet this has been fought from armchairs. This timeline shows the incredible rise of bank charges reclaiming...
Answered by James S - Fri Jun 12 03:45:45 2009
What role of government should the government take in solving the economic and employment problems?
Q. What role of government should the government take in solving the economic and employment problems? Any kind of government Republican, Demecrat, etc
Asked by RonPaulRevolution2012 - Wed Sep 7 21:04:22 2011 - Government - 6 Answers - Comments
A. That depends what government you're talking about.
Answered by - Wed Sep 7 21:06:29 2011
Q. What role of government should the government take in solving the economic and employment problems? Any kind of government Republican, Demecrat, etc
Asked by RonPaulRevolution2012 - Wed Sep 7 21:04:22 2011 - Government - 6 Answers - Comments
A. That depends what government you're talking about.
Answered by - Wed Sep 7 21:06:29 2011
the government s efforts to build multiple nuclear plants in the country?
Q. The demand for power in India has been constantly growing. However, power generation has not kept pace with demand, leading to frequent power cuts in several parts of India. Against this backdrop, assess the government s efforts to build multiple nuclear plants in the country. What are the pros and cons of nuclear power? Considering that countries like the US have not constructed new nuclear power plants in the last few decades due to the high costs involved and other reasons, how does one justify the Indian government s plans? Support your argument with facts and figures.
Asked by raghvendra p - Wed Jan 20 07:18:32 2010 - Other - Politics & Government - 3 Answers - Comments
A. Nuclear Pros and Cons PROS !. Fission is the most energy for the least fuel with current technology. 2. Less fuel means less waste, and the waste is all accounted for, not released into the atmosphere to become someone else's problem. 3. Uranium is readily available, very common in the earth's crust (about the same as tin) 4. Economical - operating cost about the same as coal, fuel cost is a much smaller percentage of the total, therefore less susceptible to price fluctuations. 5. Reliable - Nuclear power plants have very high capacity factors, Much higher than solar or wind 6. No combustion, no Co, CO2 or SO2 released. 7. Creates high paying, skilled jobs. 8. Reduce dependence on foreign oil/ fuel. Uranium available domestically and in… [cont.]
Answered by - Sat Jan 23 12:03:03 2010
Q. The demand for power in India has been constantly growing. However, power generation has not kept pace with demand, leading to frequent power cuts in several parts of India. Against this backdrop, assess the government s efforts to build multiple nuclear plants in the country. What are the pros and cons of nuclear power? Considering that countries like the US have not constructed new nuclear power plants in the last few decades due to the high costs involved and other reasons, how does one justify the Indian government s plans? Support your argument with facts and figures.
Asked by raghvendra p - Wed Jan 20 07:18:32 2010 - Other - Politics & Government - 3 Answers - Comments
A. Nuclear Pros and Cons PROS !. Fission is the most energy for the least fuel with current technology. 2. Less fuel means less waste, and the waste is all accounted for, not released into the atmosphere to become someone else's problem. 3. Uranium is readily available, very common in the earth's crust (about the same as tin) 4. Economical - operating cost about the same as coal, fuel cost is a much smaller percentage of the total, therefore less susceptible to price fluctuations. 5. Reliable - Nuclear power plants have very high capacity factors, Much higher than solar or wind 6. No combustion, no Co, CO2 or SO2 released. 7. Creates high paying, skilled jobs. 8. Reduce dependence on foreign oil/ fuel. Uranium available domestically and in… [cont.]
Answered by - Sat Jan 23 12:03:03 2010
How does the Chinese government work? How much power does the president+government possess?
Q. I know China is a communist country where the government owns most of the things. How much power does their president Hu Jin Tao and their government possess? How long is the term of the president? How much terms can the president serve?
Asked by Will - Tue Oct 4 23:29:28 2011 - Other - Politics & Government - 1 Answers - Comments
A. They possess all power still, they are the biggest employer in China and keep their eye on all walks of life.
Answered by thecharleslloyd - Sat Oct 8 10:40:11 2011
Q. I know China is a communist country where the government owns most of the things. How much power does their president Hu Jin Tao and their government possess? How long is the term of the president? How much terms can the president serve?
Asked by Will - Tue Oct 4 23:29:28 2011 - Other - Politics & Government - 1 Answers - Comments
A. They possess all power still, they are the biggest employer in China and keep their eye on all walks of life.
Answered by thecharleslloyd - Sat Oct 8 10:40:11 2011
What happens when the government runs out of money, and becomes bankrupt?
Q. The U.S. Federal Government is in major extreme almost unsolvable debt, State governments sometimes go broke resulting in a shut down of services. So what happens when a state government goes bankrupt for a long period of time, say 6 months to a year? What if the Fed can't give grants, and loans to keep state services open?
Asked by advait0 - Sun Nov 25 01:54:22 2007 - Government - 10 Answers - Comments
A. Bankruptcy of government will lead to anarchy since when government officials are no longer paid, they will stop working and will abandon their offices paralyzing entirely the government operations.
Answered by FRAGINAL, JTM - Sun Nov 25 03:36:26 2007
Q. The U.S. Federal Government is in major extreme almost unsolvable debt, State governments sometimes go broke resulting in a shut down of services. So what happens when a state government goes bankrupt for a long period of time, say 6 months to a year? What if the Fed can't give grants, and loans to keep state services open?
Asked by advait0 - Sun Nov 25 01:54:22 2007 - Government - 10 Answers - Comments
A. Bankruptcy of government will lead to anarchy since when government officials are no longer paid, they will stop working and will abandon their offices paralyzing entirely the government operations.
Answered by FRAGINAL, JTM - Sun Nov 25 03:36:26 2007
From Yahoo Answer Search: 'government'
Tue Jan 17 17:27:57 2012
)