Sarmatians Answers
Romans vs Sarmatians (Italy vs Ukraine) who is stronger?
Q.
Asked by - Thu Aug 4 03:13:41 2011 - Military - 1 Answers - Comments
A. Doesn't matter because those nations are inferior. The United States of America is the best and if you have a problem with that come make 14,000,000,000,000 a year and have the worlds greatest military force and come take us over. Idiot.
Answered by - Thu Aug 4 03:46:59 2011
Q.
Asked by - Thu Aug 4 03:13:41 2011 - Military - 1 Answers - Comments
A. Doesn't matter because those nations are inferior. The United States of America is the best and if you have a problem with that come make 14,000,000,000,000 a year and have the worlds greatest military force and come take us over. Idiot.
Answered by - Thu Aug 4 03:46:59 2011
Why do you think that Lithuanian's are just Balts, when we are the sarmatians - the last posterity of them...?
Q. Sarmatians were widely spread in Europe, when Atlantida sunk down... We had to migrate from the Black sea up to the Europe. We splited all around the Europe, we had been communicated with the Egypt and had the same Gods. But the Christianity and Christian wars killed sarmatians, destroyed our ancient scripts ( runas) and even now they deny all scripts where sarmatians are noted. But Lithuania was the last country which took Christians belief after huge fights...That's why our Speech is more ancient than the other Europeans, that's why we can read ancient Greece Speeche, the old runas and even Egyptian hieroglyphs. And now we can say that the history has wrong gloss in a lot of Egyptian hieroglyphs. SO we can number more than 7 thousand of… [cont.]
Asked by - Mon Sep 19 07:22:02 2011 - Languages - 1 Answers - Comments
A. To me this is a new challenge, I have to read about Sarmatians to give my opinion.
Answered by - Mon Sep 19 07:43:04 2011
Q. Sarmatians were widely spread in Europe, when Atlantida sunk down... We had to migrate from the Black sea up to the Europe. We splited all around the Europe, we had been communicated with the Egypt and had the same Gods. But the Christianity and Christian wars killed sarmatians, destroyed our ancient scripts ( runas) and even now they deny all scripts where sarmatians are noted. But Lithuania was the last country which took Christians belief after huge fights...That's why our Speech is more ancient than the other Europeans, that's why we can read ancient Greece Speeche, the old runas and even Egyptian hieroglyphs. And now we can say that the history has wrong gloss in a lot of Egyptian hieroglyphs. SO we can number more than 7 thousand of… [cont.]
Asked by - Mon Sep 19 07:22:02 2011 - Languages - 1 Answers - Comments
A. To me this is a new challenge, I have to read about Sarmatians to give my opinion.
Answered by - Mon Sep 19 07:43:04 2011
Are any of the European R1a Y-chromosomes identical to those in Asia?
Q. I got into an argument with someone about whether or not the Scythians or Sarmatians intermixed at all with the Slavs, and he claims that all European R1a is found only in Europe, and is only related to R1a outside of Europe from 20,000 years ago.
Asked by Troy K - Tue Feb 16 23:06:15 2010 - Anthropology - 1 Answers - Comments
A. There are many subclades of R1a as it is considered a haplogorup in its own right due to its origins in antiquity. I would not be surprised if the specific subclades found in say parts of India are quite different to those found in Slavic peoples of Europe. It's a matter of time to most recent common ancestor (MRCA). Most Europeans are R1a1a, and this subclade may or may not be found in india (probably not, but I am not an expert on haplogroup R).
Answered by Roger S - Wed Feb 17 05:02:00 2010
Q. I got into an argument with someone about whether or not the Scythians or Sarmatians intermixed at all with the Slavs, and he claims that all European R1a is found only in Europe, and is only related to R1a outside of Europe from 20,000 years ago.
Asked by Troy K - Tue Feb 16 23:06:15 2010 - Anthropology - 1 Answers - Comments
A. There are many subclades of R1a as it is considered a haplogorup in its own right due to its origins in antiquity. I would not be surprised if the specific subclades found in say parts of India are quite different to those found in Slavic peoples of Europe. It's a matter of time to most recent common ancestor (MRCA). Most Europeans are R1a1a, and this subclade may or may not be found in india (probably not, but I am not an expert on haplogroup R).
Answered by Roger S - Wed Feb 17 05:02:00 2010
Suicide options? Help please ?
Q. I don't want to be here anymore! I have tryed I honestly have I've spoken to sarmatians and they are crap! I want to go now! But I'm worried if there is a god will he judge me? Fastest and safest way? Where to do it? As I don't want my little brother and sister to see me? Any info please help No I'm not doing it do for people to say not to do it! I've had enough! And I have spoken to people hasn't helped honestly I'm 19 and my life has been crap all the way though I don't want to be here anymore! There is nothing and noone to live for! Yes people will be hurt but in the long run its better for everyone! They will get over it and come to terms with it! I can't cope and I don't want to so its my decision and I was only asking questions to… [cont.]
Asked by - Wed Dec 28 16:18:54 2011 - Psychology - 9 Answers - Comments
A. If you leave now, you'll never be able to experience what your future has in store. You'll never accomplish your dreams, walk where nobody else has walked, make a difference in someone's life down the road, and if you're not happy now, experience genuine bliss. Life comes with troubles and pain, it is completely inevitable. Although the world seems like a bitter and evil place, there are wonderful, beautiful things that you have yet to experience. You are loved, and I wish so dearly that you will take this to heart. I have been there before, to my breaking point, and I'm so glad I didn't do it. One of my good friends did it, and it took a toll on our whole entire city. Nothing is the same without him, his family is still scarred for life… [cont.]
Answered by - Wed Dec 28 16:44:12 2011
Q. I don't want to be here anymore! I have tryed I honestly have I've spoken to sarmatians and they are crap! I want to go now! But I'm worried if there is a god will he judge me? Fastest and safest way? Where to do it? As I don't want my little brother and sister to see me? Any info please help No I'm not doing it do for people to say not to do it! I've had enough! And I have spoken to people hasn't helped honestly I'm 19 and my life has been crap all the way though I don't want to be here anymore! There is nothing and noone to live for! Yes people will be hurt but in the long run its better for everyone! They will get over it and come to terms with it! I can't cope and I don't want to so its my decision and I was only asking questions to… [cont.]
Asked by - Wed Dec 28 16:18:54 2011 - Psychology - 9 Answers - Comments
A. If you leave now, you'll never be able to experience what your future has in store. You'll never accomplish your dreams, walk where nobody else has walked, make a difference in someone's life down the road, and if you're not happy now, experience genuine bliss. Life comes with troubles and pain, it is completely inevitable. Although the world seems like a bitter and evil place, there are wonderful, beautiful things that you have yet to experience. You are loved, and I wish so dearly that you will take this to heart. I have been there before, to my breaking point, and I'm so glad I didn't do it. One of my good friends did it, and it took a toll on our whole entire city. Nothing is the same without him, his family is still scarred for life… [cont.]
Answered by - Wed Dec 28 16:44:12 2011
Were some of the sarmatians light skinned?
Q.
Asked by unbrokensoldier - Wed Dec 1 19:52:05 2010 - History - 2 Answers - Comments
A. They were an Iranian people, and Herodotus describes them as blond and tanned. Both these suggest that at least some of them were light shkinned.
Answered by ammianus - Wed Dec 1 20:27:16 2010
Q.
Asked by unbrokensoldier - Wed Dec 1 19:52:05 2010 - History - 2 Answers - Comments
A. They were an Iranian people, and Herodotus describes them as blond and tanned. Both these suggest that at least some of them were light shkinned.
Answered by ammianus - Wed Dec 1 20:27:16 2010
Was Constantine the Great one of the greatest Roman military leaders?
Q. I know that he is most known for being the first Christian Emperor and all, but wasent he also a military genius? Some say that he could have still been called "the great" on his military achievements alone. Not only did he defeat Maxentius (who outnumbered him) and but eliminated any other threat to his thrown as Emperor. He also won major victories over the Franks and Alamanni in 306 8, the Franks again in 313 14, Sarmatians in 334. In fact, by 336, Constantine had actually reoccupied most of the long-lost province of Dacia, which Aurelian had been forced to abandon in 271. He even defeated the people that sacked Rome and helped bring the end of the western empire, the Goths. The people that once destroyed several roman legions… [cont.]
Asked by - Sun May 17 21:46:59 2009 - History - 1 Answers - Comments
A. Was Constantine the Great one of the greatest Roman military leaders?Yes ---Although he earned his honorific of "The Great" ("Megas") from Christian historians long after he had died, he could have claimed the title on his military achievements and victories alone. In addition to reuniting the Empire under one emperor, Constantine won major victories over the Franks and Alamanni in 306 8, the Franks again in 313 14, the Visigoths in 332 and the Sarmatians in 334. In fact, by 336, Constantine had actually reoccupied most of the long-lost province of Dacia, which Aurelian had been forced to abandon in 271. At the time of his death, he was planning a great expedition to put an end to raids on the eastern provinces from the… [cont.]
Answered by Charles K - Sun May 17 21:57:23 2009
Q. I know that he is most known for being the first Christian Emperor and all, but wasent he also a military genius? Some say that he could have still been called "the great" on his military achievements alone. Not only did he defeat Maxentius (who outnumbered him) and but eliminated any other threat to his thrown as Emperor. He also won major victories over the Franks and Alamanni in 306 8, the Franks again in 313 14, Sarmatians in 334. In fact, by 336, Constantine had actually reoccupied most of the long-lost province of Dacia, which Aurelian had been forced to abandon in 271. He even defeated the people that sacked Rome and helped bring the end of the western empire, the Goths. The people that once destroyed several roman legions… [cont.]
Asked by - Sun May 17 21:46:59 2009 - History - 1 Answers - Comments
A. Was Constantine the Great one of the greatest Roman military leaders?Yes ---Although he earned his honorific of "The Great" ("Megas") from Christian historians long after he had died, he could have claimed the title on his military achievements and victories alone. In addition to reuniting the Empire under one emperor, Constantine won major victories over the Franks and Alamanni in 306 8, the Franks again in 313 14, the Visigoths in 332 and the Sarmatians in 334. In fact, by 336, Constantine had actually reoccupied most of the long-lost province of Dacia, which Aurelian had been forced to abandon in 271. At the time of his death, he was planning a great expedition to put an end to raids on the eastern provinces from the… [cont.]
Answered by Charles K - Sun May 17 21:57:23 2009
did you ever hear of this, i thought constantine made christianity the official religion?
Q. The Delphic oracle was established in the 8th century BC.[1] Its last recorded response was given in 393 AD, when the emperor Theodosius I ordered pagan temples to cease operation Theodosius I (born Jan. 11, 347, Cauca, Gallaecia [Spain] died Jan. 17, 395, Mediolanum) was Roman emperor of the East (379 392) and of East and West (392 395). Born of Christian parents, he served in the military under his father, a general. He distinguished himself against the Sarmatians and was proclaimed coemperor by Gratian to rule in the eastern empire (379). To settle the contentious debate over true Christianity, he adopted the Nicene Creed as the Christian norm (380). He reached a treaty with the Visigoths (382). When the Spanish general Maximus… [cont.]
Asked by niteshade - Sun Mar 29 23:17:48 2009 - Religion & Spirituality - 4 Answers - Comments
A. He did. The emperor Julian succeeded Constantine and reverted to polytheism. Unfortunately he died only 3 months into his reign and never visited Rome. History would have been soo different had he survived a little longer.
Answered by Ceiling Catte - Sun Mar 29 23:23:18 2009
Q. The Delphic oracle was established in the 8th century BC.[1] Its last recorded response was given in 393 AD, when the emperor Theodosius I ordered pagan temples to cease operation Theodosius I (born Jan. 11, 347, Cauca, Gallaecia [Spain] died Jan. 17, 395, Mediolanum) was Roman emperor of the East (379 392) and of East and West (392 395). Born of Christian parents, he served in the military under his father, a general. He distinguished himself against the Sarmatians and was proclaimed coemperor by Gratian to rule in the eastern empire (379). To settle the contentious debate over true Christianity, he adopted the Nicene Creed as the Christian norm (380). He reached a treaty with the Visigoths (382). When the Spanish general Maximus… [cont.]
Asked by niteshade - Sun Mar 29 23:17:48 2009 - Religion & Spirituality - 4 Answers - Comments
A. He did. The emperor Julian succeeded Constantine and reverted to polytheism. Unfortunately he died only 3 months into his reign and never visited Rome. History would have been soo different had he survived a little longer.
Answered by Ceiling Catte - Sun Mar 29 23:23:18 2009
wat did the sarmatians hav to do with king arthur?
Q.
Asked by idhjs - Mon Nov 26 18:48:11 2007 - History - 3 Answers - 1 Comments
A. Arthur was supposedly of Sarmatian stock, a nation that was overrun by the Romans and forced into military service for a period of time. The most recent King Arthur movie cites "recent scholarship" or something like that -- like some ancient text just recently turned up -- that claims that Arthur was a Sarmatian and was carried off to be in the Roman military until 21 or 25. After completing what they believed to be their final mission, Rome presses them into one more and afterward, Arthur realizes that the Rome that he fought for is no more, so he decides to remain in England and unite all of the warring factions there -- the Picts, Celts, Angles, Saxon, Irish, etc. But this "recent scholarship" is not named.
Answered by actormyk - Mon Nov 26 18:57:57 2007
Q.
Asked by idhjs - Mon Nov 26 18:48:11 2007 - History - 3 Answers - 1 Comments
A. Arthur was supposedly of Sarmatian stock, a nation that was overrun by the Romans and forced into military service for a period of time. The most recent King Arthur movie cites "recent scholarship" or something like that -- like some ancient text just recently turned up -- that claims that Arthur was a Sarmatian and was carried off to be in the Roman military until 21 or 25. After completing what they believed to be their final mission, Rome presses them into one more and afterward, Arthur realizes that the Rome that he fought for is no more, so he decides to remain in England and unite all of the warring factions there -- the Picts, Celts, Angles, Saxon, Irish, etc. But this "recent scholarship" is not named.
Answered by actormyk - Mon Nov 26 18:57:57 2007
Julius Caesar vs Constantine the Great, who was the better leader?
Q. Julius caesar military: - Conquered all of Gaul - Defeated the Helvetti - Defeated Vercingtorix - Defeated Pompey - Brilliantly won the Battle of Alesia, despite being outnumbered 5 to 1 - First Roman to take control parts of Britianna for a while - Won the Battle of Pharsalus, despite being outnumbered - Did however lose some battles like Gergovia and Dyrrhachium Politicly: - Responsible for the end of the Roman Republic - Responsible for the birth of the Roman Empire - Gained support of the people of Rome - Expanded the territories of Rom by conquering Gaul - Leader of Rome for several years constantine the great military: - Undefeated - Defeated the Franks, Alamanni, Visigoths, Sarmatians - Defeated Maxentius - Defeated Licinius -… [cont.]
Asked by - Sun Jun 21 23:27:19 2009 - History - 2 Answers - Comments
A. Personally I think Julius Caesar was the better leader, he won the support of his people without exploiting religion to do so, at least not any more than any other politician of his time. Constantine may or may not have converted to Christianity, but he used it as a political tool because he recognized it's popularity and its ability to quickly shut out other religions and become dominant. JC also appeared on the political scene when he was desperately needed by the people. The urban infrastructure of Rome was deteriorating through neglect by the Republic and he took personal responsibility for public works (instead of processional Triumphs and victory monuments). He gained the support of his people by giving them badly needed public works. [cont.]
Answered by ica_muhaha - Mon Jun 22 02:32:42 2009
Q. Julius caesar military: - Conquered all of Gaul - Defeated the Helvetti - Defeated Vercingtorix - Defeated Pompey - Brilliantly won the Battle of Alesia, despite being outnumbered 5 to 1 - First Roman to take control parts of Britianna for a while - Won the Battle of Pharsalus, despite being outnumbered - Did however lose some battles like Gergovia and Dyrrhachium Politicly: - Responsible for the end of the Roman Republic - Responsible for the birth of the Roman Empire - Gained support of the people of Rome - Expanded the territories of Rom by conquering Gaul - Leader of Rome for several years constantine the great military: - Undefeated - Defeated the Franks, Alamanni, Visigoths, Sarmatians - Defeated Maxentius - Defeated Licinius -… [cont.]
Asked by - Sun Jun 21 23:27:19 2009 - History - 2 Answers - Comments
A. Personally I think Julius Caesar was the better leader, he won the support of his people without exploiting religion to do so, at least not any more than any other politician of his time. Constantine may or may not have converted to Christianity, but he used it as a political tool because he recognized it's popularity and its ability to quickly shut out other religions and become dominant. JC also appeared on the political scene when he was desperately needed by the people. The urban infrastructure of Rome was deteriorating through neglect by the Republic and he took personal responsibility for public works (instead of processional Triumphs and victory monuments). He gained the support of his people by giving them badly needed public works. [cont.]
Answered by ica_muhaha - Mon Jun 22 02:32:42 2009
Is the Russian word for ''one'' a reference to the Norse god Odin?
Q. I'm not fluent in Russian, but I learned quite a bit of the language a few years ago because of a job I had. I've always wondered about the Russian word for ''one.'' It's pronounced ''ah-DEEN,'' with the accent on the second syllable, but in type (sorry, I don't know how to type Cyrillic letters), it looks like it could be pronounced ''Odin.'' It seems reasonable enough to me that at least some of the ancient Sarmatians may have worshipped Norse gods (remember that Finland and Norway border Russia), but I don't know for sure. Did they? If so, do you think the Russian word for ''one'' is a reference to Odin? I've always thought that using one of Odin's names for the number one may be a way of implying that he is the most important of all… [cont.]
Asked by That Guy Drew - Sat Nov 8 21:33:48 2008 - Religion & Spirituality - 5 Answers - Comments
A. There is a saying in Russian: "Odin Bogh, odna pravda." that means "There is only one God and only one truth" The word "od In" (one) has the etymology from the antique Latin oinos "inus", Greek o nh " So may be that "od In" and "Odin" have common roots. as weel as the English word "one" and "Odin" may be cognate words if to mind the etymology: "one" - O.E. an, from P.Gmc. *ainaz (cf. O.N. einn, Dan. een, O.Fris. an, Du. een, Ger. ein, Goth. ains), from PIE *oinos (cf. Gk. oinos "ace (on dice)," L. unus "one," O.Pers. aivam, O.C.S. -inu, ino-, Lith. vienas, O.Ir. oin, Breton un "one").
Answered by Nadina K - Sun Nov 9 02:11:05 2008
Q. I'm not fluent in Russian, but I learned quite a bit of the language a few years ago because of a job I had. I've always wondered about the Russian word for ''one.'' It's pronounced ''ah-DEEN,'' with the accent on the second syllable, but in type (sorry, I don't know how to type Cyrillic letters), it looks like it could be pronounced ''Odin.'' It seems reasonable enough to me that at least some of the ancient Sarmatians may have worshipped Norse gods (remember that Finland and Norway border Russia), but I don't know for sure. Did they? If so, do you think the Russian word for ''one'' is a reference to Odin? I've always thought that using one of Odin's names for the number one may be a way of implying that he is the most important of all… [cont.]
Asked by That Guy Drew - Sat Nov 8 21:33:48 2008 - Religion & Spirituality - 5 Answers - Comments
A. There is a saying in Russian: "Odin Bogh, odna pravda." that means "There is only one God and only one truth" The word "od In" (one) has the etymology from the antique Latin oinos "inus", Greek o nh " So may be that "od In" and "Odin" have common roots. as weel as the English word "one" and "Odin" may be cognate words if to mind the etymology: "one" - O.E. an, from P.Gmc. *ainaz (cf. O.N. einn, Dan. een, O.Fris. an, Du. een, Ger. ein, Goth. ains), from PIE *oinos (cf. Gk. oinos "ace (on dice)," L. unus "one," O.Pers. aivam, O.C.S. -inu, ino-, Lith. vienas, O.Ir. oin, Breton un "one").
Answered by Nadina K - Sun Nov 9 02:11:05 2008
Romans vs Sarmatians (Italy vs Ukraine) who is stronger?
Q.
Asked by - Thu Aug 4 03:10:13 2011 - History - 3 Answers - Comments
A. The Roman army did beat the Sarmantians. So they really were stronger.
Answered by - Thu Aug 4 03:24:51 2011
Q.
Asked by - Thu Aug 4 03:10:13 2011 - History - 3 Answers - Comments
A. The Roman army did beat the Sarmantians. So they really were stronger.
Answered by - Thu Aug 4 03:24:51 2011
Isn't it ridiculous how some people claim that diversity and race mixing are a strength when in fact...?
Q. ace mixing is definitely unhealthy. The Roman civilization collapsed BECAUSE they mixed with darker people from the Middle East and a few Africans. They lost their advanced traits. Had they not intermarried with others or only married other Whites like the Germanians, Celts, Balts, Greeks, Dacians and Sarmatians/ Slavs, the Roman civilization might not have collapsed So that makes me think Brazil is the Iiberal blueprint for every white nation. They want us occupited with screwing (creating a mongrelized race), doing and selling drugs. Fighting over the scraps while they rob the country blind. I've noticed there some Brazilians that are proud that Brazil is a mongrelized country. That everyone has some black or indigenous blood in their… [cont.]
Asked by - Mon Dec 28 17:25:41 2009 - Other - Cultures & Groups - 3 Answers - Comments
A. Rome collapsed for a number of reasons, mostly because it's hard for a decadent society to maintain the infrastructure and bureaucracy to effectively govern, police, and protect an empire *that* large with ancient technology. The empire was, simply put, too big, and collapsed under its own weight.
Answered by ArcadianStormcrow - Tue Dec 29 10:16:27 2009
Q. ace mixing is definitely unhealthy. The Roman civilization collapsed BECAUSE they mixed with darker people from the Middle East and a few Africans. They lost their advanced traits. Had they not intermarried with others or only married other Whites like the Germanians, Celts, Balts, Greeks, Dacians and Sarmatians/ Slavs, the Roman civilization might not have collapsed So that makes me think Brazil is the Iiberal blueprint for every white nation. They want us occupited with screwing (creating a mongrelized race), doing and selling drugs. Fighting over the scraps while they rob the country blind. I've noticed there some Brazilians that are proud that Brazil is a mongrelized country. That everyone has some black or indigenous blood in their… [cont.]
Asked by - Mon Dec 28 17:25:41 2009 - Other - Cultures & Groups - 3 Answers - Comments
A. Rome collapsed for a number of reasons, mostly because it's hard for a decadent society to maintain the infrastructure and bureaucracy to effectively govern, police, and protect an empire *that* large with ancient technology. The empire was, simply put, too big, and collapsed under its own weight.
Answered by ArcadianStormcrow - Tue Dec 29 10:16:27 2009
What do you know about Sarmatians?
Q. Would you please mention your sources? Thank you. Peter C, I did spell it properly. I mean Sarmatians - not Samaritans. If you do not know the word - for goodness sake, check it out in the dictionary.
Asked by Eve - Mon Nov 27 09:44:57 2006 - History - 2 Answers - Comments
A. The Sarmatians, Sarmatae or Sauromatae were a multi-ethnic confederacy of western Scythia, mentioned by classical authors from Herodotus onward. Their major element in the south was Iranian. In history, however, many tribes were under the name, which was Sarmatian to some, and Sauromatian to others. Pliny the Elder (N.H. book iv) equates the two names, saying that the Latin Sarmatae is identical to the Greek Sauromatae. At their greatest reported extent these tribes ranged from the Vistula river to the mouth of the Danube and eastward to the Volga, and from the mysterious domain of the Hyperboreans in the north southward to the shores of the Black and Caspian seas, including the region between them as far as the Caucasus mountains. The… [cont.]
Answered by roshpi - Mon Nov 27 10:14:29 2006
Q. Would you please mention your sources? Thank you. Peter C, I did spell it properly. I mean Sarmatians - not Samaritans. If you do not know the word - for goodness sake, check it out in the dictionary.
Asked by Eve - Mon Nov 27 09:44:57 2006 - History - 2 Answers - Comments
A. The Sarmatians, Sarmatae or Sauromatae were a multi-ethnic confederacy of western Scythia, mentioned by classical authors from Herodotus onward. Their major element in the south was Iranian. In history, however, many tribes were under the name, which was Sarmatian to some, and Sauromatian to others. Pliny the Elder (N.H. book iv) equates the two names, saying that the Latin Sarmatae is identical to the Greek Sauromatae. At their greatest reported extent these tribes ranged from the Vistula river to the mouth of the Danube and eastward to the Volga, and from the mysterious domain of the Hyperboreans in the north southward to the shores of the Black and Caspian seas, including the region between them as far as the Caucasus mountains. The… [cont.]
Answered by roshpi - Mon Nov 27 10:14:29 2006
Why are " Historians" so intent on a Sarmatian connection?
Q. to the King Arthur legends . It's just a myth, maybe possibly figures from different points in history I don't know - unlikely . However after that horrible film King Arthur more historians are looking into a connection with these so called "knights". Some even suggested that the sword in the stone legend may have come from Sarmatian culture. even more scary is that the link was there before the movie!. It just ruins a British fairy tale ... is there any honest Evidence which may link these Sarmatians to the legend? . Because quiet frankly they were nothing special, they seemed culturally and militarily very weak I am sorry to say .. but British people are mixed Saxons bred with Britons, as did Danes ... even before the saxon… [cont.]
Asked by - Sun Jun 12 12:56:57 2011 - History - 5 Answers - Comments
A. There were Sarmatian cavalry serving with the Roman army, but the notion that they were somehow Arthur's knights is a modern one. The idea that Arthur had all these cavalrymen is medieval (12thc) and is not mentioned in earlier writing. Many false statements were made wheen that movie was about to come out, such as Avalon was the fort on Hadrian's wall called Avalana.All this really shows is that there are two names with the root name 'afal' meaning Apple. They did the same with Camelot, matching it to some other name starting with 'Cam' that was in the area of Hadrian's wall--well, Cam is a VERY common celtic rootword found all across Britain. As for the claim that the 'sword in the stone' myth is somehow more intrinsic to Eastern Europe-- [cont.]
Answered by brother_in_magic - Sun Jun 12 16:54:41 2011
Q. to the King Arthur legends . It's just a myth, maybe possibly figures from different points in history I don't know - unlikely . However after that horrible film King Arthur more historians are looking into a connection with these so called "knights". Some even suggested that the sword in the stone legend may have come from Sarmatian culture. even more scary is that the link was there before the movie!. It just ruins a British fairy tale ... is there any honest Evidence which may link these Sarmatians to the legend? . Because quiet frankly they were nothing special, they seemed culturally and militarily very weak I am sorry to say .. but British people are mixed Saxons bred with Britons, as did Danes ... even before the saxon… [cont.]
Asked by - Sun Jun 12 12:56:57 2011 - History - 5 Answers - Comments
A. There were Sarmatian cavalry serving with the Roman army, but the notion that they were somehow Arthur's knights is a modern one. The idea that Arthur had all these cavalrymen is medieval (12thc) and is not mentioned in earlier writing. Many false statements were made wheen that movie was about to come out, such as Avalon was the fort on Hadrian's wall called Avalana.All this really shows is that there are two names with the root name 'afal' meaning Apple. They did the same with Camelot, matching it to some other name starting with 'Cam' that was in the area of Hadrian's wall--well, Cam is a VERY common celtic rootword found all across Britain. As for the claim that the 'sword in the stone' myth is somehow more intrinsic to Eastern Europe-- [cont.]
Answered by brother_in_magic - Sun Jun 12 16:54:41 2011
Who were the Sarmatians?
Q. I'm refering to the ones in the film King Arthur...i had already searched for sarmatians in wikipedia, and it seems that they came from the Iranian area mostly, although other tribes reffered to themselves as Sarmatians too...in the film...it seems that the ones they were refering to were from Ukraine? Also...what happened to them? Were they wiped out? Or did they just intermarry? Thanks in advance
Asked by SomeLady - Sat Apr 12 17:47:26 2008 - History - 3 Answers - Comments
A. The territory of Sarmatia was an expansive stretch of land reaching from the Caspian Sea in the East to the Vistula River in the West, and as far south as the Danube. Essentially, Sarmatia was a collection of independent tribes, much like ancient Germania, that encompassed parts of modern Russia, Ukraine, the Baltic States, Central Asian nations and into central European countries such as Romania and Poland. The Sarmatian people were a blend of Iranian nomadic horse tribes that were likely related to the Scythians. Herodotus suggested in the 5th century BC that the Sauromatae, perhaps the original Sarmatians, were descended from the Scythians and the Amazons. The Amazon legend was widely accepted among Greeks and later Romans, thanks to… [cont.]
Answered by Carl R - Sat Apr 12 17:52:03 2008
Q. I'm refering to the ones in the film King Arthur...i had already searched for sarmatians in wikipedia, and it seems that they came from the Iranian area mostly, although other tribes reffered to themselves as Sarmatians too...in the film...it seems that the ones they were refering to were from Ukraine? Also...what happened to them? Were they wiped out? Or did they just intermarry? Thanks in advance
Asked by SomeLady - Sat Apr 12 17:47:26 2008 - History - 3 Answers - Comments
A. The territory of Sarmatia was an expansive stretch of land reaching from the Caspian Sea in the East to the Vistula River in the West, and as far south as the Danube. Essentially, Sarmatia was a collection of independent tribes, much like ancient Germania, that encompassed parts of modern Russia, Ukraine, the Baltic States, Central Asian nations and into central European countries such as Romania and Poland. The Sarmatian people were a blend of Iranian nomadic horse tribes that were likely related to the Scythians. Herodotus suggested in the 5th century BC that the Sauromatae, perhaps the original Sarmatians, were descended from the Scythians and the Amazons. The Amazon legend was widely accepted among Greeks and later Romans, thanks to… [cont.]
Answered by Carl R - Sat Apr 12 17:52:03 2008
Are Pashtuns and Jats related to Croats and Serbs ?
Q. It's this myth that's been going around about how Serbs and Croats aren't really slavic people and are of instead Iranian origin and somehow they are descendants of Scytho-Sarmatians that settled in the slavic homeland and overtime preserved their iranian name but replaced Scythian with south slavic... seing places on the web or people from iran being so proud of having iranian croats Again history repeats itself the Ruhilla Pashtuns of Utar Pradesh were Originally Iranian speakers but adopted Hindi replacing Pashto completely when conquered by Mughals now they move in pakistan and almost all of them think they're Desi and not Iranian, it's important cause we actually see this trend in action while for serbs and croats, their assimilation… [cont.]
Asked by waterbear_waterbear - Tue May 18 12:22:56 2010 - History - 2 Answers - Comments
A. Is this a question or a statement? You would need to be able to show that different cultural or linguistic elements were similar between the two groups. Pottery, religious artifacts, that kind of stuff. You don't show any of that. It also doesn't prove anything that a couple of words are similar since Serbo-Croatian, Hindi and Pashto are all Indo-European languages and have many similarities. You can find similar words between Russian and English, but that doesn't mean that the English are transplanted slavs or vice-versa.
Answered by Comrade Snarkovich - Tue May 18 14:20:29 2010
Q. It's this myth that's been going around about how Serbs and Croats aren't really slavic people and are of instead Iranian origin and somehow they are descendants of Scytho-Sarmatians that settled in the slavic homeland and overtime preserved their iranian name but replaced Scythian with south slavic... seing places on the web or people from iran being so proud of having iranian croats Again history repeats itself the Ruhilla Pashtuns of Utar Pradesh were Originally Iranian speakers but adopted Hindi replacing Pashto completely when conquered by Mughals now they move in pakistan and almost all of them think they're Desi and not Iranian, it's important cause we actually see this trend in action while for serbs and croats, their assimilation… [cont.]
Asked by waterbear_waterbear - Tue May 18 12:22:56 2010 - History - 2 Answers - Comments
A. Is this a question or a statement? You would need to be able to show that different cultural or linguistic elements were similar between the two groups. Pottery, religious artifacts, that kind of stuff. You don't show any of that. It also doesn't prove anything that a couple of words are similar since Serbo-Croatian, Hindi and Pashto are all Indo-European languages and have many similarities. You can find similar words between Russian and English, but that doesn't mean that the English are transplanted slavs or vice-versa.
Answered by Comrade Snarkovich - Tue May 18 14:20:29 2010
relationships of scythians and sarmatians?
Q.
Asked by S K M - Fri May 23 13:38:03 2008 - Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered - 1 Answers - Comments
A. They were the ancient descendants of Scottish / British people.
Answered by Double Diamonds - Fri May 23 13:50:19 2008
Q.
Asked by S K M - Fri May 23 13:38:03 2008 - Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered - 1 Answers - Comments
A. They were the ancient descendants of Scottish / British people.
Answered by Double Diamonds - Fri May 23 13:50:19 2008
Why were the Sarmatians seen as a threat?
Q. By Romans and Germans etc? It is said the Romans respected them and the Germans even feared them.
Asked by Chunky Kit Kat - Thu Sep 8 09:07:36 2011 - History - 1 Answers - Comments
A. They were the principal enemy of Israel.. Many wars were fought over them. I also think they stole the ark of the covenant.
Answered by Rowan M - Thu Sep 8 10:36:18 2011
Q. By Romans and Germans etc? It is said the Romans respected them and the Germans even feared them.
Asked by Chunky Kit Kat - Thu Sep 8 09:07:36 2011 - History - 1 Answers - Comments
A. They were the principal enemy of Israel.. Many wars were fought over them. I also think they stole the ark of the covenant.
Answered by Rowan M - Thu Sep 8 10:36:18 2011
Are the brahmin Caste of Hinduism descended from sarmatians? They use a common surname "Sarma" or "Sharma"?
Q. They were religious priests and teachers of martial arts to the soldier caste of Hinduism?
Asked by shak - Mon Nov 26 16:09:21 2007 - Religion & Spirituality - 4 Answers - Comments
A. Certainly not. t Hey were completely isolated for sometime because of politics. now that the politicians have understood.The brahmin force.. eg. uttar pradesh.
Answered by sundaresaiyer - Tue Nov 27 05:29:34 2007
Q. They were religious priests and teachers of martial arts to the soldier caste of Hinduism?
Asked by shak - Mon Nov 26 16:09:21 2007 - Religion & Spirituality - 4 Answers - Comments
A. Certainly not. t Hey were completely isolated for sometime because of politics. now that the politicians have understood.The brahmin force.. eg. uttar pradesh.
Answered by sundaresaiyer - Tue Nov 27 05:29:34 2007
Are the brahmin Caste of Hinduism descended from sarmatians? They use a common surname "Sarma" or "Sharma"?
Q. They were religious priests and teachers of martial arts to the soldier caste of Hinduism?
Asked by shak - Mon Nov 26 16:20:28 2007 - Anthropology - 2 Answers - 1 Comments
A. Sarmatia was the ancient name for Poland... So the answer would be No!
Answered by peternal - Mon Nov 26 22:32:46 2007
Q. They were religious priests and teachers of martial arts to the soldier caste of Hinduism?
Asked by shak - Mon Nov 26 16:20:28 2007 - Anthropology - 2 Answers - 1 Comments
A. Sarmatia was the ancient name for Poland... So the answer would be No!
Answered by peternal - Mon Nov 26 22:32:46 2007
From Yahoo Answer Search: 'sarmatians'
Mon Feb 13 14:22:02 2012